Specifications include, but are not limited to: Determine the property card attributes that pertain to the presence and dimensions, and as applicable, any other exterior characteristics, of structures and surfaces (“improvements”) that have a material impact on assessments and may be accurately determined using the flyover data provided by the State of Connecticut and, as needed, any other information sources. Use a valid, statistically reliable, and replicable methodology to identify improvements, determine their dimensions, and, as applicable, any other exterior characteristics of them, compare these with CAMA systems to identify discrepancies, and flag property cards where discrepancies exceed one or more significance levels or critical values and would be expected to have an impact on assessed values, providing information about the attributes that are discrepant, current values and best estimates, relevant aerial imagery, and links to the geocoordinates of the property at online viewers such as Google Earth or Bing Maps. Produce estimated corrected values for each discrepant attribute, with the option to import or merge in selected or, as desired, all attributes into the respective property card and CAMA system. Produce a report with information on project goals, scope, timeline, participants, inputs/methodology/outputs, findings, and interpretation, and recommended next steps. The report should enable the projects outputs to be applied, even if all personnel turn over and their successors have no familiarity with the project Produce an export for forwarding to a mass revaluation firm
