This is a new requirement to for commercial construction services to install striping and signage to cross walks and speed humps. The Contractor shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, transportation, and supervision necessary to perform striping, restriping and signage of the crosswalks and speed humps at Buckley, Space Force Base (SFB). Please see attached Statement of Work (SOW) and Request for Quote document for further details.
A pre-site visit will be held if requested, however due to fiscal year restraints and our timeline, we intend to provide you enough information that a site visit is not deemed necessary. Site-visit request are due by 23 Sept 2025 at 1:00pm (MDT) and must be accompanied by the attached Form 128 Access Roster. If a site vist does take place, it will occur 25 Sept 2025.
Question regarding the solicitation are due to the Contracting Officer and Contracting specialists listed as the primary and secondary points of contact by 3:00pm MST 25 Sept 2025. Please include both listed points of contact on all communication.
Quotes regarding the solicitation are due to the Contracting Officer and Contracting specialists listed as the primary and secondary points of contact by 3:30pm MST 26 Sept 2025. Please include both listed points of contact on all communication.
Q&A for FA254325Q0050:
Question: Can you clarify what the actual shutdown expectations will be, and how you’d like communications handled with base personnel during the work? As written, the traffic control components (certified supervisor, 30-day plan, etc.) would likely cost more than the striping itself, which doesn’t seem like the intent here. Are you looking for full lane closures and detailed submittals, or would more limited, short-term controls (cones/flagging) be acceptable during restriping?
Answer : Correct, that is not the intent here. The contractor provided cones and flagging to ensure the safety of the product provided to the government is acceptable. Of course, if drying paint were smeared everywhere because a car ran through it (and there were no protective devices), the Contractor would be liable – whatever they see fit.
