Specifications include, but are not limited to: he Study shall be developed within the legal frameworks of 49 C.F.R. § 23, 49 C.F.R. § 26, and applicable federal court rulings, to determine, in a fair and valid way, if discrimination or its effects exist in Augusta, Georgia (Augusta) contracting practices. The Study shall also include a review and analysis of Augusta’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) program for federal, state, and locally-funded projects and, more particularly, Augusta’s contracting and subcontracting policies, procedures, andpractices relative to the solicitation of, and participation by DBEs in federal, state, and locally-funded prime contracts and subcontracts. The final written report shall be comprised of two parts: an Availability Analysis and a Disparity Analysis. Theseanalyses shall comport with the requirements of all applicable requirements of all federal, state, and local laws, including, at a minimum, the court rulings from the United States Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and the United States District Courts of Georgia. Further, the statistical analyses shall be technically sound and consistent with court-approved methodologies for collecting and analyzing evidence of discrimination, as discussed by the courts in Sherbrooke Turf, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 345 F.3rd964 (8thCir. 2003), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 2158 (2004), and in Northern Contracting, Inc. v. Illinois Department of Transportation, 473 F.3d 715 (7thCir. 2007).