Specifications include, but are not limited to: 1. To determine whether the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, the aggregate discretely presented component units, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows, thereof [and the respective budgetary comparison for the (indicate the major governmental funds involved)] in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, to determine whether the combining and individual nonmajor fund financial statements are fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. In addition, to determine whether the financial statements presented as supplementary information present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of each of the government’s nonmajor governmental, nonmajor enterprise, internal service, and fiduciary funds and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 2. To obtain an understanding of the five components of internal control that is sufficient to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements whether due to error or fraud, and to design the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures. Because an audit of a government’s financial statements is based on opinion units, the auditor’s consideration of internal control in assessing the risks of material misstatement should address each opinion unit. The auditor should obtain a sufficient understanding by performing risk assessment procedures to (a) evaluate the design of controls and (b) determine whether they have been implemented. The auditor should use such knowledge to identify types of potential misstatements; consider factors that affect the risks of material misstatement; and design tests of controls, when applicable, and subsequent procedures. In acquiring an understanding of and assessing internal control, the auditor should consider computer controls as well as the controls over manual portions of the system.